Is "Murka" the subject in this sentence: "Murka's kittens were Murzik and Vaska"? - briefly
No, "Murka" is not the subject in the sentence "Murka's kittens were Murzik and Vaska." The subject of this sentence is "kittens."
Is "Murka" the subject in this sentence: "Murka's kittens were Murzik and Vaska"? - in detail
To determine whether "Murka" is the subject in the sentence "Murka's kittens were Murzik and Vaska," we need to analyze the grammatical structure of the sentence.
First, let us break down the sentence:
- "Murka's kittens": This is a possessive phrase where "kittens" is the head noun and "Murka's" is a possessive adjective modifying it. The word "Murka's" indicates ownership or possession, meaning that the kittens belong to Murka.
- "were": This verb is in the past tense and serves as the linking verb in this sentence.
- "Murzik and Vaska": These are the subject complements, providing additional information about the kittens.
The possessive phrase "Murka's kittens" functions as the subject of the sentence because it is the entity that "were" Murzik and Vaska. The verb "were" agrees with the plural noun "kittens," indicating that "Murka's kittens" is indeed the grammatical subject.
Therefore, "Murka" itself is not the subject of the sentence; rather, it is part of a possessive phrase that serves as the subject. The entire possessive phrase "Murka's kittens" acts as the subject, indicating that the focus of the sentence is on the kittens that belong to Murka.
In conclusion, while "Murka" is an important part of the sentence, it does not function as the grammatical subject. The subject of the sentence is "Murka's kittens."